You have heard it from both sides — an agent explaining why the IUL wins, a forum thread explaining why it does not. This calculator lets you explore the assumptions instead of taking either side’s word for it. Start with the same earnings budget, then compare a simplified IUL cash-value model with a Roth IRA and a pre-tax 401(k). Contributions, costs, and access rules differ. The numbers are scenarios, not a verdict on which product you should buy.
2026 contribution limits are used below and held flat in future years. Check current rules and policy documents before acting.
Change the funding, tax, return, and cost assumptions and watch the results move. The same starting earnings budget is used for all three, but contribution caps can leave different amounts outside each account. IUL values are before borrowing and any distribution tax; retirement-account values use simplified tax assumptions. The largest number is not automatically the most suitable choice.
Drag a slider or type a value. The comparison updates as you enter valid values.
Read the comparison this way: the annual amount is pre-tax earnings. The 401(k) uses pre-tax contributions; Roth and IUL funding use the budget left after the selected current tax rate. The model applies fixed 2026 age-based retirement contribution caps, but does not verify income eligibility, compensation, plan rules, or actual insurance funding limits. Unused budget is shown separately and earns no modeled return. IUL expenses use assumed rates and a simplified death-benefit adjustment, not a carrier illustration. No MEC determination or IUL access tax is calculated. Compare the whole budget, not just the highlighted account.
Before age 59½, Roth qualification and 401(k) additional taxes or exceptions require separate review. Roth values assume qualified tax-free access; the 401(k) output excludes early-withdrawal additional tax.
| At retirement | 401(k) | Roth IRA | IUL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amount that reached the bucket | |||
| Employer match added on top | — | — | |
| Uninvested after-tax budget (not in chart) | |||
| Modeled balance | |||
| Modeled tax deduction | |||
| IUL policy charges paid | — | — | |
| Ending value under stated assumptions |
Bring your questions about funding, coverage, taxes, and costs. Compare actual contract illustrations and retirement-account alternatives before committing money.
Request a SessionA single ending value flattens real differences. Four of them matter, and they don't all favor the same bucket.
Life insurance provides a death benefit under the policy’s terms while coverage is in force. Underwriting, exclusions, contestability provisions, and policy debt matter. This calculator does not compare term insurance plus investing, premiums for equal coverage, or beneficiary outcomes.
Policy borrowing depends on available loan value and contract terms, and interest adds cost. Non-MEC loans are generally not current taxable income while coverage stays in force, but exceptions and policy events matter. Retirement accounts also have exceptions and different access rules; Roth contributions and earnings are treated differently. Early-access taxes are not calculated here.
This model uses 2026 IRA and 401(k) caps, including the higher 401(k) catch-up for ages 60–63. Direct Roth IRA eligibility also depends on income and compensation. Insurance does not use the IRA contribution cap, but funding is constrained by contract terms, underwriting, and tax qualification rules that this tool does not calculate.
Stated plainly: an underfunded or over-borrowed policy can lapse, and a lapse can trigger taxes on gains. The market buckets can't lapse. This strategy demands meaningful, sustained funding — which is exactly why the design session comes before any policy.
The point of the tool is the shape of the trade-off. The point of the session is running it with your real balance sheet, your real brackets, and questions to review with appropriately licensed insurance and tax professionals.
Request a SessionThis calculator is a hypothetical educational illustration, not a projection, a promise, or a carrier illustration, and it is not tax, legal, or investment advice. Indexed universal life crediting is subject to caps and participation rates set by the carrier and can be 0% in a given year; policy charges are deducted regardless of index performance. Policy loans accrue interest and reduce the death benefit and available cash value if not repaid, and a policy that lapses or is surrendered may create taxable income. Columbia Wealth Protection provides education. Insurance recommendations and placement require appropriately licensed professionals. Tax law can change; consult your own tax advisor about your situation.
The umbrella strategy behind the IUL column — both growth engines, the access rules, and the costs, explained at the same depth.
Read next →The 7-pay line every IUL design has to respect — and what changes the day a funding plan crosses it.
Read next →